I agree with Howard Stern !

 

wow, how full of shit are you?

1. All civil servants are required to get the vax
That includes congress all the way down to police, Fire, EMT, governors, military, and list goes on.

2. Tired ass argument: sounds like this
Well if I drive the speed limit why do I need a seat belt?
But that just not it is it….
It:
Drive the speed limit
Follow the rules of the road
Pay attention
Drive defensive
Don’t drive drunk or impaired
Oh…. And put on your seat belt.

while doing all of these things can greatly reduce your risk of getting into a car crash, they also can reduce the severity of a car crash.

but just because one person died while wearing a seat belt doesn’t mean they don’t work.

we made seat belts mandatory because the severity of the accidents were reduced. Emergency staff from EMT, Paramedics, Fireman, Police, ER Dr.s and Nurses suddenly have
Less patients
Less sever injuries
Costs less money
Saves more lives


Having the VAX is an added layer of protection.
Wearing the mask is an added layer of protection.
DONT FORGET TO WASH YOUR FUCKING HANDS
SOCIAL DISTANCE WHEN YOU CAN
DISINFECT SURFACES
AVOID HIGH TRAFFIC GERM SITUATIONS

No one wants to ware the masks. But yes, people have died through the transmission of this virus. So your little buzz light year meme can fuck right off moron. If you honestly can’t understand the basic concept of transmitting germs and how these past two years have effected the whole planet then you might be a lost cause.

3 your DDT meme is woefully misleading Im sure you need a lesson. So here it is.
The use of DDT start in 1930s

Jesus how full of shit are you

 

PLANDEMIC
LIERUS
CONVID.. Plc it's a fkn business

 

I really feel like you need a week long history lesson on how our forefathers handled outbreaks and quarantines, as well as how other counties have handled it both in the past and present.

hey did you ever visit another country? Guess what proof of vaccine
Did you go to college? Proof of vaccine?
Did you go to high school? Proof of vaccine?
Did you play a sport in high school? Yup, you needed extra vaccines, you had a higher risk for fluid transmissions.
Did you go to grade school K-8, middle, junior high, what ever they called it where ever you went??? Yup… proofe of vaccine.
Do you work a job around metal? sharp objects? Chance of injury? Yups better re-up your tetanus other wise you can’t work here.
Do you work in the medical field? You need a TB test (as well as others) and a bunch of vaccines.

stop posting your dumb ignorant memes.

 

You missed the point of the meme.
Remember, we were told get vaccinated.
Everything is fine if you're vaccinated.
Then it was well, but get a booster.
A booster will make it all better.
Now, its well, not quite. Vaccination will make it less severe, but you might still get it. Oh, and never mind that Omicron isn't deadly, and if you get it, vaccinated or not, it won't be much more than a cold.

But hey, get those boosters.

So yeah, the science isn't working but the business model is.

 

And who the fuck are you @Getdirty140 to lecture anyone about their healthcare decisions?
You a doctor?
No?
Then stop, please.

 

How fu

How full of shit are you??? I’m not missing the point. You’re over simplifying a complex issue.

 

2021 people were saying the hands were the most washed things.. when in reality it was brains.

 

Marvin Lee Aday aka Meatloaf was a very vocal antivaxxer. He died from covid. Kinda ironic, doncha think?

 

Kash’s Corner: Top Scientists Who Pushed ‘Natural Origins’ Received $50 Million from NIAID?

“How did these guys get $50 million in funding? … That’s moving a lot of money in federal government.”

On Kash’s Corner, we discuss an investigation by Epoch Times’ journalists Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke. After reviewing funding data, they found that four scientists who were at the forefront of pushing the natural origins narrative received millions in grant money from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in 2020 and 2021.



Below is a rush transcript of this Kash’s Corner episode from Jan 21, 2022. This transcript may not be in its final form and may be updated.


Kash Patel: Hey everybody. And welcome back to Kash’s corner. I’m here again with my good friend Jan and we got a couple of great topics to talk about today.

Jan Jekielek: Well, Kash, why don’t we start off with a new article this time by Hans Mankey and Jeff Carlson. And this is quite incredible. I’m just going to read the full headline, but it speaks to something that you and I have been talking about quite a bit in the past. Here’s the headline, “Scientists Who WERE Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020 to 2021.”

So, basically these guys jumped in, they looked at basically the funding, the details of the funding that had been put out during these years. And they found that these, a number of very, very prominent scientists, three of them were actually involved in this proximal origins paper that basically set the narrative that you can’t, that basically that the lab origin or possible lab leak, that’s all a conspiracy theory. They were actually, these people were involved right in this paper. And a number of them got a lot of, appeared to have gotten a lot of, kind of a boost in funding.

Mr. Patel: I don’t even know where to start because this it’s such a problematic issue in government. And I’m glad that, Epoch Times is doing a great job covering this issue. It’s critically important to government oversight. And we’ll talk about that in a second about holding people accountable internally in government. But as a guy who was in all three branches of government, at one point in his career, we sign onto these agreements when we sign up to serve that you can’t do anything for yourself, pecuniary, monetary gain. You can’t sort of go on the side and have alternate revenues or get funding for your programs through the process.

That’s just not outlined like it is for the NIH stuff. And that’s what most people don’t dive into, because I don’t think before COVID, Jan, how many people even knew what NIH was? I had heard of it and I knew they were doing lots of things in the medical field, but we just never pressed on these matters. And I thought it was something, these conflict free funding streams were, I thought, supposed to be everywhere in government, but it seems that’s not the case. And I’m glad you brought up this article and there’s a whole host of parameters I’d like to get into on this stuff.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, no. And absolutely, and the thing is we don’t know the reasons exactly that they got these funding increases. It’s just that I think what this brings to light is this is something that should be investigated, that should be looked at. And maybe this is actually where we can start is when such information comes to light, for example, because we know for example that this narrative of natural origins was unreasonable scientifically. That at least we know that much. And so what happens in this sort of situation where you see this kind of curious timing, correlation, so to speak.

Mr. Patel: And I think you’re right. And I think we should say at the outset it’s worth investigation, it’s looking into. We don’t know the details behind it. So we can’t jump to conclusion and say everything they did was bad or not by the book, I want to be upfront about that. It just looks very suspicious. And typically, what happens is you have… nowadays you have fewer and fewer great journalists, but they break a story like this. And that’s how it gets on people’s radars.

And then you and I talk about it and it gets out there and other people start to take notice and say, “Wait a second, this doesn’t smell right. These are people in government that were not elected but nominated to serve in these positions. Are they doing everything by the book?” And there’s a couple different avenues you can go here, Jan. And I’ve had some experience on the Capitol Hill side of things, it’s called constitutional oversight.

So what happens is there’s committees on Capitol Hill, there’s the Banking Committee, the Foreign Relations Committee, Finance Committee. And in this instance, there’s committees related to not just COVID, but also medical funding, research grants, and things like that. That’s where Congress legislates the funding because it has to come from Congress. There has to be a law or a rule passed in Congress in a budget so that this money can be spent accordingly to that law. What happens is a lot of these committees then look at how that money was actually spent. Did it go to the legislative purpose? Did it go to the reason why that funding stream was created.

And what happens is the committees have these subcommittees, not to get into too much of the weeds, but they start taking a look at these things when news breaks and say, “Wait a second, how do these guys get $50 million in funding in such short turnaround,” that’s moving a lot of money in federal government for something as important as COVID origins and treating COVID and things like that. So, that’s one aspect of it. We can get into others, but I don’t know that I’ve seen Congress take this mantle up to dive into this funding stream. And I hope they will, but as you know, there’s limited bandwidth in D.C. these days on Capitol Hill.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, and so obviously this is all from these FOIA requests. Looking at emails and then looking at and corresponding funding that was allotted. In one case that’s actually, I think quite notable that they-

Mr. Patel: Can I just stop you? Sorry, I didn’t want to interrupt, but you brought up a great point Jan that I didn’t even get into. FOIA for people that don’t know what that is for our audiences, Freedom of Information Act. It was a federal statute that was passed by Congress years and years ago.

And the purpose of it is because there’s not supposed to be any secrets in government from its citizenry apart from classified information, and that’s a whole different deal in terms of the national security apparatus. But the FOIA Act and legislation was passed so journalists, everyday Americans from across the country, can go and write to their government and say, “I want the pages and documents related to the funding of this research. I want the pages and documents from the Department of Justice, from the FBI, from the Department of Agriculture, from senior leadership in government.”

Mr. Jekielek: So here’s one of the things they found. And this is, so this is really interesting because the three of the guys were on this February call with Dr. Fauci themselves. They had expressed sort of significant probability likelihood that this was a lab origin or lab leak. But then later that this proximal origin, that same day, the first draft of that proximal origin paper was written by a number of them basically saying no, that’s impossible. It has to be natural.

The fourth person who’s cited in this article is actually Peter Dazsak. And what’s really interesting is that the timing of his grants, actually, it comes very shortly after President Trump had actually revoked his previous grant from NIAID in April, 2020 because of his basically connection with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Mr. Patel: Yeah. And I think, man, there’s so much to impact there. The layers of investigation that need to happen here. A: how did this funding stream come about so quickly to these individuals for such an extensive amount of money, how did they specifically tailor funding to support their research so quickly. Those answers aren’t going to be had by just sending one or two individuals to Congress to testify before a public committee.

Those answers are going to be had by the documentations of the applications for the grants, which is also, you can get through the FOIA process. Interviews of these individuals who, which I think should be, they should be subject to interview and say fully to the American people and explain how did they get these tens of millions of dollars in total and then what did they do with it? And were they biased in trying to get this funding stream?

That’s the kicker for me, Jan. It’s that you’re taking American taxpayer dollars and you’re saying, “Okay, is it appropriate to use that money? Are we doing what Congress legislated that money to go to? And is it serving the function of the American people?” And if it’s not, and if there’s some sort of mischief for lack of a better word here or foul play, then we’re talking about a lot of money.

That’s not how research and grants are supposed to work. You’re supposed to bid for it. You’re supposed to have a nexus to a government purpose for it. And then you’re supposed to put out the research that comes from your work. You’re not supposed to sort of reverse engineer and say, “Hey, I have a specific expertise in X, Y, or Z. So we’re going to take that $10 million and use it for X, Y, or Z.” I think that’s what ticks off so many Americans. And if that’s what’s happened here, then I think is a breaking news story.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, and there’s this other element it strikes, people keep kind of referencing this idea that, on the one side, the people that are doing, kind of setting the policy are the people doing the funding. And that there’s potential conflict of interest. The term conflict of interest comes to mind. And so how does that actually work? Because there’s also these carve outs because conflict of interest obviously is something that is looked at very seriously in these sorts of funding agencies. So how does this all work?

Mr. Patel: So each government agency has rules in place. Each government agency and department has an office of general counsel, a team of lawyers that sort of runs the everyday operations in terms of legalities and conflicts for any such department, NIH, Department of Agriculture, Department of Justice, FBI, what have you. What they’re supposed to do is keep their employees in check.

More can be read here:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kashs...s-received-50-million-from-niaid_4228743.html

 

• 
  Biden’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers Blocked Nationwide
  President Joe Biden's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees was blocked on Friday by a federal judge. Biden ...
  January 21, 2022BY Zachary Stieber
  
  https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litig...andate-for-federal-workers-blocked-nationwide

 

The Cult of the Jab